zlacker

[parent] [thread] 14 comments
1. m3kw9+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:48:32
If you go out just a little bit not everyone hates him. Personally I think he hasn’t don’t anything overt yet. So he banned a few journalists, do you know why? No right? So why judge so early?
replies(5): >>thwoei+e2 >>gcbirz+Q2 >>philos+V4 >>nickth+89 >>sofixa+Ve
2. thwoei+e2[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:58:54
>>m3kw9+(OP)
The journos were doxxing his location. See pretty unethical on their part, if proven true.
replies(5): >>gcbirz+63 >>sf_rob+h3 >>janals+h4 >>Spanis+4a >>recurs+Mi
3. gcbirz+Q2[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:01:26
>>m3kw9+(OP)
Yeah, we do. He said that they were banned for linking to other social media of ElonJet.
replies(1): >>zmgsab+25
◧◩
4. gcbirz+63[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:02:54
>>thwoei+e2
No, they weren't. They linked to Facebook and Mastodon pages that aggregated publicly available data about where his PLANE went.
replies(1): >>zmgsab+l5
◧◩
5. sf_rob+h3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:03:52
>>thwoei+e2
The journalist were linking to an aggregator* of public FAA data of a jet that Elon may or may not be on… not “his location”

*granted he had to do a tiny bit of work to counter the insufficient obfuscation the FAA allows for privacy.

◧◩
6. janals+h4[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:09:24
>>thwoei+e2
You mean the FAA was doxxing him?
7. philos+V4[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:12:31
>>m3kw9+(OP)
Fuck Elon musk. Judge early? How much info do you need? Is it too early to judge trump too? Get your head out of the dirt
◧◩
8. zmgsab+25[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:13:32
>>gcbirz+Q2
So… journalists responded to a policy against doxxing by doxxing the owner of the company and then cried when they got banned?

…and I’m supposed to care?

replies(1): >>mcphag+qa
◧◩◪
9. zmgsab+l5[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:14:49
>>gcbirz+63
…information that had previously gotten an account banned for doxxing.

They thumbed their nose at a rule, got banned, and then cried about it.

What am I supposed to care about, exactly?

replies(1): >>Bryant+Ka
10. nickth+89[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:34:08
>>m3kw9+(OP)
If you willfully ignore the last month of events maybe that could float.
◧◩
11. Spanis+4a[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:39:59
>>thwoei+e2
they were doxxing his location about as my as my reply is doxxing yours.

what a joker.

◧◩◪
12. mcphag+qa[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:42:36
>>zmgsab+25
Nope, you’re just supposed to enjoy Comedy being Legal Again!
◧◩◪◨
13. Bryant+Ka[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:44:24
>>zmgsab+l5
Given that the rule didn’t exist when Elon originally banned @ElonJet?

I’d suggest that you care about the fact that Elon will ban anyone he wants banned, and make up a justification post-facto. If you don’t care who gets banned from Twitter, then I retract my suggestion.

14. sofixa+Ve[view] [source] 2022-12-16 04:11:13
>>m3kw9+(OP)
> Personally I think he hasn’t don’t anything overt yet

Like calling people risking their lives to save a bunch of kids pedophiles? Or using fascist dogwhistles?

◧◩
15. recurs+Mi[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 04:36:40
>>thwoei+e2
Elon is pulling the wool to incite his mob. He states people are doxxing his real-time location. The only people he’s banning are those that reference publicly available FAA flight data. I even think the owner of the Twitter account put the tweet on a time delay. Far from the truth.
[go to top]