zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. xxs+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 07:53:39
It was a sarcastic response.
replies(1): >>js8+m2
2. js8+m2[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:17:25
>>xxs+(OP)
From what I have seen, HN is not especially keen on sarcasm either. Which I somewhat disagree with, I think it's a good alternative way how to make people think about something, rather than directly attacking the argument.
replies(2): >>xxs+m5 >>fragme+X5
◧◩
3. xxs+m5[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:46:26
>>js8+m2
Indeed, and to me the sarcasm was beyond obvious - 1st sentence: two words and an exclamation mark. One interesting caveat was that the account was brand new (like just created).
◧◩
4. fragme+X5[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:52:46
>>js8+m2
If ML algos ever manage to recognize sarcasm then we're truly in trouble. Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers. Tone just doesn't come across well in text.
replies(1): >>xxs+0a
◧◩◪
5. xxs+0a[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 09:27:59
>>fragme+X5
>Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers.

I have heard (seen) the statement so many times. Personally, I find it quite trivial to detect; so I suppose it's partly related to how much sarcasm one would indulge in normal daily routine.

>Tone just doesn't come across

Gotta train on that dead pan delivery.

[go to top]