zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. js8+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:17:25
From what I have seen, HN is not especially keen on sarcasm either. Which I somewhat disagree with, I think it's a good alternative way how to make people think about something, rather than directly attacking the argument.
replies(2): >>xxs+03 >>fragme+B3
2. xxs+03[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:46:26
>>js8+(OP)
Indeed, and to me the sarcasm was beyond obvious - 1st sentence: two words and an exclamation mark. One interesting caveat was that the account was brand new (like just created).
3. fragme+B3[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:52:46
>>js8+(OP)
If ML algos ever manage to recognize sarcasm then we're truly in trouble. Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers. Tone just doesn't come across well in text.
replies(1): >>xxs+E7
◧◩
4. xxs+E7[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 09:27:59
>>fragme+B3
>Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers.

I have heard (seen) the statement so many times. Personally, I find it quite trivial to detect; so I suppose it's partly related to how much sarcasm one would indulge in normal daily routine.

>Tone just doesn't come across

Gotta train on that dead pan delivery.

[go to top]