zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. supern+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 06:29:57
I disagree: mental laziness is never a good justification. (I recently started to memorize more things, since I do not believe in "just google it"). Also, I want to read what fellow humans relate. Even though it might sometimes be difficult to tell the difference, I attend HN as a substitute for physical social interactions. For mere knowledge or problem solving, other places might fill that role.
replies(1): >>xxs+O7
2. xxs+O7[view] [source] 2022-12-12 07:53:39
>>supern+(OP)
It was a sarcastic response.
replies(1): >>js8+aa
◧◩
3. js8+aa[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:17:25
>>xxs+O7
From what I have seen, HN is not especially keen on sarcasm either. Which I somewhat disagree with, I think it's a good alternative way how to make people think about something, rather than directly attacking the argument.
replies(2): >>xxs+ad >>fragme+Ld
◧◩◪
4. xxs+ad[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:46:26
>>js8+aa
Indeed, and to me the sarcasm was beyond obvious - 1st sentence: two words and an exclamation mark. One interesting caveat was that the account was brand new (like just created).
◧◩◪
5. fragme+Ld[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:52:46
>>js8+aa
If ML algos ever manage to recognize sarcasm then we're truly in trouble. Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers. Tone just doesn't come across well in text.
replies(1): >>xxs+Oh
◧◩◪◨
6. xxs+Oh[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 09:27:59
>>fragme+Ld
>Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers.

I have heard (seen) the statement so many times. Personally, I find it quite trivial to detect; so I suppose it's partly related to how much sarcasm one would indulge in normal daily routine.

>Tone just doesn't come across

Gotta train on that dead pan delivery.

[go to top]