zlacker

if you're posting your code publicly on the web, its hard to get upset that people are seeing/using it

>>jijji+(OP)
It's under the very specific license though. With your logic it's OK to train AI on a leaked Windows code then. It is/was publicly on the web.

>>jijji+(OP)
Can I introduce you to a concept called copyright?

Is it fine if an author publishes a short story publicly on the web for someone else to submit it to a contest as their own work?

>>jijji+(OP)
https://nedroidcomics.tumblr.com/post/41879001445/the-intern...

>>betaby+L
code licenses will be irrelevant in a few years if you are able to refactor anything you want using ai.

>>betaby+L
While I agree with the first portion of your rebuttal, the second portion makes no sense as leaked code is not "you" putting it on the internet. It would be a nefarious actor doing so.

>>lerpga+Y5
Unless lawyers from the music industry step in.

>>betaby+L
Yes? Its production code that is supposed to work (keyword supposed). I'd like the code-suggestor to also be trained on AAA games source leaks.

>>qu4z-2+D2
Please don’t use plagiarism as an argument for keeping copyright. They are not related. Plagiarism is already illegal or disallowed for obvious reasons, but copyright is a different matter.

>>teddyh+ye
I brought up plagiarism because it's what happened in this case. Maybe I shouldn't've mentioned copyright at all.