zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. betaby+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-16 20:55:09
It's under the very specific license though. With your logic it's OK to train AI on a leaked Windows code then. It is/was publicly on the web.
replies(3): >>lerpga+d5 >>galley+j7 >>themoo+z9
2. lerpga+d5[view] [source] 2022-10-16 21:46:08
>>betaby+(OP)
code licenses will be irrelevant in a few years if you are able to refactor anything you want using ai.
replies(1): >>betaby+n7
3. galley+j7[view] [source] 2022-10-16 22:06:41
>>betaby+(OP)
While I agree with the first portion of your rebuttal, the second portion makes no sense as leaked code is not "you" putting it on the internet. It would be a nefarious actor doing so.
◧◩
4. betaby+n7[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-16 22:07:18
>>lerpga+d5
Unless lawyers from the music industry step in.
5. themoo+z9[view] [source] 2022-10-16 22:26:07
>>betaby+(OP)
Yes? Its production code that is supposed to work (keyword supposed). I'd like the code-suggestor to also be trained on AAA games source leaks.
[go to top]