zlacker

>>davidg+(OP)
if you're posting your code publicly on the web, its hard to get upset that people are seeing/using it

>>jijji+29
It's under the very specific license though. With your logic it's OK to train AI on a leaked Windows code then. It is/was publicly on the web.

>>betaby+N9
While I agree with the first portion of your rebuttal, the second portion makes no sense as leaked code is not "you" putting it on the internet. It would be a nefarious actor doing so.