zlacker

For what it's worth, there's Gemini. You can't really call it rich document though, as styling is left to the user consuming the content.

>>jgilia+(OP)
Well I don't want styling just document structure/description (eg. H1-8, Title, EM, P, IMG, Author, Article, Forum-Post, Search-Result) and yes I want images too so Gemini goes way too far my uses.

>>bobaje+k4
Images complicate the accessible requirement.

>>postal+z7
True, it's still worth doing though. That's one of the reasons for alt, longdesc, and aria-describedby attributes.

>>bobaje+0k
What image formats will be support? Plain old 256 color uncompressed bitmaps?

Why leave an existing protocol and easy accessibility just for a few images.

>>postal+Cm
I'm not sure I know how to explain it. Images just seem a basic part of content. I just don't think it's acceptable to have to open up an external application to view images in a document.

Any way I'm not against image galleries and video sites either. I just want control over how I consume those. If I want the page read to me it should be possible. If I want to consume it on a tiny 2x2" e-ink display that should be doable.

>>bobaje+k4
Yes, I'd really like an HTML subset without CSS or Javascript.