zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. postal+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-06-22 12:00:10
Images complicate the accessible requirement.
replies(1): >>bobaje+rc
2. bobaje+rc[view] [source] 2022-06-22 13:18:35
>>postal+(OP)
True, it's still worth doing though. That's one of the reasons for alt, longdesc, and aria-describedby attributes.
replies(1): >>postal+3f
◧◩
3. postal+3f[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-06-22 13:36:28
>>bobaje+rc
What image formats will be support? Plain old 256 color uncompressed bitmaps?

Why leave an existing protocol and easy accessibility just for a few images.

replies(1): >>bobaje+dj
◧◩◪
4. bobaje+dj[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-06-22 14:01:09
>>postal+3f
I'm not sure I know how to explain it. Images just seem a basic part of content. I just don't think it's acceptable to have to open up an external application to view images in a document.

Any way I'm not against image galleries and video sites either. I just want control over how I consume those. If I want the page read to me it should be possible. If I want to consume it on a tiny 2x2" e-ink display that should be doable.

[go to top]