zlacker

[return to "What will a Chromium-only Web look like?"]
1. mnd999+Y9[view] [source] 2022-06-22 10:35:48
>>dochtm+(OP)
Probably we have to start again with something different in the same way as the web replaced all the other protocols (gopher, usenet etc). I’m not what that looks like but it should be cleaner, simpler, open and blockchain-free.
◧◩
2. bobaje+Ba[view] [source] 2022-06-22 10:40:43
>>mnd999+Y9
Yes, I've been wanting something that's just a rich document but designed around accessibility with no styles or JavaScript.
◧◩◪
3. jgilia+Td[view] [source] 2022-06-22 11:07:11
>>bobaje+Ba
For what it's worth, there's Gemini. You can't really call it rich document though, as styling is left to the user consuming the content.
◧◩◪◨
4. bobaje+di[view] [source] 2022-06-22 11:39:05
>>jgilia+Td
Well I don't want styling just document structure/description (eg. H1-8, Title, EM, P, IMG, Author, Article, Forum-Post, Search-Result) and yes I want images too so Gemini goes way too far my uses.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. postal+sl[view] [source] 2022-06-22 12:00:10
>>bobaje+di
Images complicate the accessible requirement.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. bobaje+Tx[view] [source] 2022-06-22 13:18:35
>>postal+sl
True, it's still worth doing though. That's one of the reasons for alt, longdesc, and aria-describedby attributes.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. postal+vA[view] [source] 2022-06-22 13:36:28
>>bobaje+Tx
What image formats will be support? Plain old 256 color uncompressed bitmaps?

Why leave an existing protocol and easy accessibility just for a few images.

[go to top]