zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. alkona+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-07-09 20:45:11
> generic medical symbol potentially used by anyone

But didn’t that ship sail a century ago?

Since exactly everything related to medical services/material/staff uses a red cross in the physical world, isn’t it natural that it does in movies (or games)? Is the argument here that it can be used when depicting proper use (e.g war movie or war game) but shouldn’t be used more than that since that’s the rule in the real world? That at least makes some sense.

I have been an army medic myself with a red cross armband and while I knew that this was somehow related to the Geneva convention I wasn’t actually aware that it was the exclusive right of military medical staff. Every single gadget/vehicle/facility is plastered with the symbol so it sure feels like the generic “medical whatever” symbol.

replies(2): >>theodr+j7 >>pmyteh+ch
2. theodr+j7[view] [source] 2021-07-09 21:27:18
>>alkona+(OP)
Their logo is just the flag of Evil Switzerland, anyway
3. pmyteh+ch[view] [source] 2021-07-09 22:43:28
>>alkona+(OP)
That's certainly not true in the UK. The British Red Cross use it, and the military presumably do in war zones, but everything else you'd think would have a red cross tends to have something else. White crosses on green first aid kits, blue star of life (or blue NHS logo) on ambulances, green crosses at pharmacies...

Not saying getting here from there is ready. But it may be possible.

replies(1): >>alkona+hX
◧◩
4. alkona+hX[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-07-10 08:17:24
>>pmyteh+ch
Now that you mention it the same is what I saw: equipment had the cross on green while staff and vehicles used the white cross on a red circular bottom. I thought the choice was esthetic/camouflage but it’s the Geneva convention at work.
[go to top]