zlacker

3200Hz memory??

>>eadonm+(OP)
I'm not sure what your question is. It's shared with the integrated GPU, so faster is better even if it means that it costs a bit battery life.

>>eadonm+(OP)
Wait. You're right. I did a double-take then doubted myself.

I can't find anything historical that used 3.2kHz memory access speeds, but I'm pretty sure there was something out there... from the 1960s.

>>exikyu+82
That speed is slower than magnetic memory; it could be delay-line memory, which would be even earlier.

>>threen+M1
Memory speed is usually in MHz, not Hz. They're just making fun of the mistake.