zlacker

>>ekianj+(OP)
3200Hz memory??

>>eadonm+Wg
Wait. You're right. I did a double-take then doubted myself.

I can't find anything historical that used 3.2kHz memory access speeds, but I'm pretty sure there was something out there... from the 1960s.

>>exikyu+4j
That speed is slower than magnetic memory; it could be delay-line memory, which would be even earlier.