zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. knolax+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-18 05:52:35
Context for why someone would want to burn a police car?
replies(1): >>lostms+01
2. lostms+01[view] [source] 2020-06-18 06:06:56
>>knolax+(OP)
That event happened 35 years ago.
replies(2): >>st1ck+k2 >>knolax+w2
◧◩
3. st1ck+k2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 06:21:37
>>lostms+01
yet

> no one from the city government has been criminally charged for the attack

replies(1): >>lostms+d6
◧◩
4. knolax+w2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 06:23:12
>>lostms+01
The front page has an article about a processor from 42 years ago. What's your point?
replies(1): >>lostms+h6
◧◩◪
5. lostms+d6[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 07:09:20
>>st1ck+k2
Even that was in 2005. Any charges have expiration, and once exonerated can not be brought up again.

Much changes over 15 years.

replies(1): >>kerkes+yD
◧◩◪
6. lostms+h6[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 07:11:11
>>knolax+w2
That you can't estimate how current processors will match your expectations based on how 42 years ago processor matched expectations of people living at the time.
replies(1): >>knolax+Vm2
◧◩◪◨
7. kerkes+yD[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 12:55:28
>>lostms+d6
There isn't a statute of limitations on murder in PA.
◧◩◪◨
8. knolax+Vm2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 23:23:58
>>lostms+h6
If 42 years ago Intel sold a processor that burned my house down, I might not be the biggest fan of Intel even 42 years later. This isn't about expectations, it's about reputation. Not everyone has a goldfish memory.
replies(1): >>lostms+zY4
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. lostms+zY4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-19 22:01:26
>>knolax+Vm2
MacBooks and Samsung phones had fire problems just a few years ago. So you seem to be wrong.
[go to top]