zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. lostms+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-18 06:06:56
That event happened 35 years ago.
replies(2): >>st1ck+k1 >>knolax+w1
◧
2. st1ck+k1[view] [source] 2020-06-18 06:21:37
>>lostms+(OP)
yet

> no one from the city government has been criminally charged for the attack

replies(1): >>lostms+d5
◧
3. knolax+w1[view] [source] 2020-06-18 06:23:12
>>lostms+(OP)
The front page has an article about a processor from 42 years ago. What's your point?
replies(1): >>lostms+h5
◧◩
4. lostms+d5[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 07:09:20
>>st1ck+k1
Even that was in 2005. Any charges have expiration, and once exonerated can not be brought up again.

Much changes over 15 years.

replies(1): >>kerkes+yC
◧◩
5. lostms+h5[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 07:11:11
>>knolax+w1
That you can't estimate how current processors will match your expectations based on how 42 years ago processor matched expectations of people living at the time.
replies(1): >>knolax+Vl2
◧◩◪
6. kerkes+yC[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 12:55:28
>>lostms+d5
There isn't a statute of limitations on murder in PA.
◧◩◪
7. knolax+Vl2[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-18 23:23:58
>>lostms+h5
If 42 years ago Intel sold a processor that burned my house down, I might not be the biggest fan of Intel even 42 years later. This isn't about expectations, it's about reputation. Not everyone has a goldfish memory.
replies(1): >>lostms+zX4
◧◩◪◨
8. lostms+zX4[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-06-19 22:01:26
>>knolax+Vl2
MacBooks and Samsung phones had fire problems just a few years ago. So you seem to be wrong.
[go to top]