zlacker

How is that related? Are you justifying violence?

>>qbaqba+(OP)
Context for why someone would want to burn a police car?

>>knolax+A
That event happened 35 years ago.

>>lostms+A1
yet

> no one from the city government has been criminally charged for the attack

>>lostms+A1
The front page has an article about a processor from 42 years ago. What's your point?

>>st1ck+U2
Even that was in 2005. Any charges have expiration, and once exonerated can not be brought up again.

Much changes over 15 years.

>>knolax+63
That you can't estimate how current processors will match your expectations based on how 42 years ago processor matched expectations of people living at the time.

>>qbaqba+(OP)
Just saying, certain people are very very happy to point out the violence of the oppressed, yet throw a hissy fit when people point out the violence of the oppressor.

>>antihe+gj
Justifying is not pointing out.

>>lostms+N6
There isn't a statute of limitations on murder in PA.

>>lostms+R6
If 42 years ago Intel sold a processor that burned my house down, I might not be the biggest fan of Intel even 42 years later. This isn't about expectations, it's about reputation. Not everyone has a goldfish memory.

>>qbaqba+(OP)
No, just trying to highlight the double standard when it comes to how law enforcement are treated compared to everyone else.

I also wouldn't classify destroying the car of a government organization as violence. It's destruction, but fairly mild compared to burning people's homes to the ground. And even then, I wouldn't think to compare property damage to actual violence, like murder.

>>d2v+oe3
To note another interesting double standard, its interesting how different people view say, the Waco situation than this.

>>knolax+vn2
MacBooks and Samsung phones had fire problems just a few years ago. So you seem to be wrong.