zlacker

If the curfew starts at 8pm then that means you should be in your home by then. It doesn't mean you should start making your way home at 8pm.

>>sys_64+(OP)
They're making that physically impossible. Did you read my comment?

>>xxpor+a5
Did you understand mine?

>>sys_64+s9
By implicitly agreeing that you understand what this commenter said, you're saying is that if somebody is protesting within 30 minutes of their home, it is just for them to herded into a corner, beaten, and arrested.

I don't think you'll find many others that find this to be just.

>>epista+Va
Also, it's NYC. A good proportion of any group of protesters could feasibly live within a 5-10 minute walk of wherever they're gathered.

>>epista+Va
What I said perviously. You're making some crazy assumptions by thinking I'm 'implicitly' agree with somebody. Let me repeat: the curfew starts by 8pm not for you to be on your way at that time. Most people ain't getting home in NYC in half an hour.

>>sys_64+nJ
By refusing to even acknowledge what others have said, and refusing to clarify what you mean, it's clear that you believe that somebody who is protesting within 30 minutes of their home can be justly corralled into a corner, beaten, prevented from returning to their home by curfew, and then arrested because the police unlawfully detained them in order to force them into a curfew violation.

You even say "most" and not "all" so you are explicitly acknowledging that violence is occurring to people that are being prevented from complying with law.

>>epista+IQ
?SYNTAX ERROR