zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. tastyf+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2020-04-02 17:09:04
If you reject their use of cookies how are they supposed to remember your rejection the next time you visit?
replies(1):
>>mattig+M1
◧
2. mattig+M1
[view]
[source]
2020-04-02 17:19:32
>>tastyf+(OP)
If the law doesn't make a single exception so the webpage can store a boolean value into a cookie to know this user doesn't want to be bothered with any _other_ cookies the law is wrong.
replies(2):
>>DevKoa+B2
>>stuaxo+14
◧◩
3. DevKoa+B2
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-04-02 17:24:34
>>mattig+M1
Any single exception can be a privacy attack surface. The law is correct.
◧◩
4. stuaxo+14
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-04-02 17:32:54
>>mattig+M1
It does make exception for cookies used to make the site function.
[go to top]