zlacker

The one at Reuters isn't that much better. If you refuse, Reuters will immediately forget your "Managed Consent" and slam you in the face again on your next visit.

I suspect they have no problem remembering your consent forever, it's just refusal that gets immediately forgotten.

>>jwr+(OP)
If you reject their use of cookies how are they supposed to remember your rejection the next time you visit?

>>jwr+(OP)
No offense, but are you sure you grok the whole 'cookie' concept?

>>tastyf+34
If the law doesn't make a single exception so the webpage can store a boolean value into a cookie to know this user doesn't want to be bothered with any _other_ cookies the law is wrong.

>>mattig+P5
Any single exception can be a privacy attack surface. The law is correct.

>>mattig+P5
It does make exception for cookies used to make the site function.