zlacker

>>ajavia+(OP)
For those interested in reading the actual journalism, not a blog re-writing someone else's work:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-amazon...

The HN link should probably be changed.

>>reaper+o6
The link should be changed anyway - that cookie control thing is the worst ever, offering no control.

>>Angost+1g
The one at Reuters isn't that much better. If you refuse, Reuters will immediately forget your "Managed Consent" and slam you in the face again on your next visit.

I suspect they have no problem remembering your consent forever, it's just refusal that gets immediately forgotten.

>>jwr+Hl
If you reject their use of cookies how are they supposed to remember your rejection the next time you visit?

>>tastyf+Kp
If the law doesn't make a single exception so the webpage can store a boolean value into a cookie to know this user doesn't want to be bothered with any _other_ cookies the law is wrong.

>>mattig+wr
Any single exception can be a privacy attack surface. The law is correct.