zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. throwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-09-12 08:55:14
I'm not trying to make a point or rallying against anything. I'm simply saying that I work hard to acquire resources for myself and will never give them away. We can all make moral/ethical/humane arguments about equality and fairness but I simply don't care. If that makes me unintelligent, then I suppose that's just something I'll have to accept.
replies(4): >>bildun+02 >>spytho+H2 >>bacro+L2 >>mch82+I5
2. bildun+02[view] [source] 2018-09-12 09:17:24
>>throwa+(OP)
Are you really working hard, or are you working in IT, in a first world country?
replies(2): >>michae+E2 >>TheOth+K3
◧◩
3. michae+E2[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-12 09:27:00
>>bildun+02
Probably working more intelligently but less hard than the average person at Walmart.
4. spytho+H2[view] [source] 2018-09-12 09:28:14
>>throwa+(OP)
You seem to overlook a wide range of resources - trust, admiration and friendship of others are also resources. So is a society in which people don't let each other live in poverty. The willingness of others to work with you is a resource, which you acknowledge by using a throwaway.

You don't 'give away' resources, they are transformed into other resources. Would you give up the ability to own seven cars for the knowledge that you'll never live under a bridge, no matter what? Many people would.

5. bacro+L2[view] [source] 2018-09-12 09:29:18
>>throwa+(OP)
Wow, how bright you are sir... If everybody thought like you, we would have a wonderful world, I am sure!
◧◩
6. TheOth+K3[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-12 09:43:22
>>bildun+02
Probably in finance, at a guess.
7. mch82+I5[view] [source] 2018-09-12 10:11:35
>>throwa+(OP)
So you choose the suboptimal box in the prisoners’ dilemma?
replies(1): >>xphx+4z1
◧◩
8. xphx+4z1[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-12 20:07:13
>>mch82+I5
Hopefully useful nitpick: In the "prisoner's dilemma", it's the dominant strategy. It's only sub-optimal in the /iterated/ prisoner's dilemma, the ominous reason being an expectation of continuity.
[go to top]