zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Aldo_M+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:41:14
The advertisers don't mind paying for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets.
replies(1): >>Viking+XF
◧
2. Viking+XF[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:33:26
>>Aldo_M+(OP)
You just said, "The sites I visit don't mind receiving money for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets."

If there's someone who makes content you like to see, why don't you mind draining their wallet?

replies(1): >>Aldo_M+6H
◧◩
3. Aldo_M+6H[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-05 19:42:37
>>Viking+XF
If there's someone who makes content I like to see, I purchase their merchandising, books, courses, assist to their events, etc., that's pretty simple.

Why support the middle man who just makes the Internet a worse place when you can directly support an author's efforts?

The advertisement business model just exists to justify the existence of low quality content.

replies(1): >>Viking+ry7
◧◩◪
4. Viking+ry7[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-09 15:31:57
>>Aldo_M+6H
Yeah? When was the last time you purchased a music video?

Okay, when was the last time you watched one?

You want to stand by that argument, or admit that you're talking out your butt?

[go to top]