zlacker

[return to "AdNauseam Banned from the Google Web Store"]
1. xwowse+P6[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:12:35
>>yuvada+(OP)
Can someone explain what the point of silently clicking the ads is? Why not just block them? Does clicking the ads somehow aid in blocking or is it a way of fighting back against perceived abuses by advertisers?
◧◩
2. tetrep+k7[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:15:08
>>xwowse+P6
The idea is to mess with advertisers' metrics. If people using ad blockers are peaceful protesters, AdNauseam is trying to riot.
◧◩◪
3. tyingq+g8[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:21:14
>>tetrep+k7
Assuming they aren't detected as fraudulent, it's messing with more than metrics. The advertisers, in many cases, are paying per click.

Edit: Not making a judgement here, just clarifying that the extension is doing more than messing with metrics.

◧◩◪◨
4. Aldo_M+Ib[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:41:14
>>tyingq+g8
The advertisers don't mind paying for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Viking+FR[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:33:26
>>Aldo_M+Ib
You just said, "The sites I visit don't mind receiving money for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets."

If there's someone who makes content you like to see, why don't you mind draining their wallet?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Aldo_M+OS[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:42:37
>>Viking+FR
If there's someone who makes content I like to see, I purchase their merchandising, books, courses, assist to their events, etc., that's pretty simple.

Why support the middle man who just makes the Internet a worse place when you can directly support an author's efforts?

The advertisement business model just exists to justify the existence of low quality content.

[go to top]