zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. tyingq+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:21:14
Assuming they aren't detected as fraudulent, it's messing with more than metrics. The advertisers, in many cases, are paying per click.

Edit: Not making a judgement here, just clarifying that the extension is doing more than messing with metrics.

replies(2): >>Aldo_M+s3 >>ben0x5+uj
2. Aldo_M+s3[view] [source] 2017-01-05 15:41:14
>>tyingq+(OP)
The advertisers don't mind paying for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets.
replies(1): >>Viking+pJ
3. ben0x5+uj[view] [source] 2017-01-05 17:09:52
>>tyingq+(OP)
It's precisely only messing with metrics, it just so happens that one of the metrics happens to be the one you agreed to use as basis for your payments. ;)
◧◩
4. Viking+pJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-05 19:33:26
>>Aldo_M+s3
You just said, "The sites I visit don't mind receiving money for disruptive, intrusive, battery-draining, bandwidth-consuming, rich-media advertisements, so I don't mind draining their wallets."

If there's someone who makes content you like to see, why don't you mind draining their wallet?

replies(1): >>Aldo_M+yK
◧◩◪
5. Aldo_M+yK[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-05 19:42:37
>>Viking+pJ
If there's someone who makes content I like to see, I purchase their merchandising, books, courses, assist to their events, etc., that's pretty simple.

Why support the middle man who just makes the Internet a worse place when you can directly support an author's efforts?

The advertisement business model just exists to justify the existence of low quality content.

replies(1): >>Viking+TB7
◧◩◪◨
6. Viking+TB7[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-09 15:31:57
>>Aldo_M+yK
Yeah? When was the last time you purchased a music video?

Okay, when was the last time you watched one?

You want to stand by that argument, or admit that you're talking out your butt?

[go to top]