zlacker

[return to "How to succeed in MrBeast production (Leaked PDF)"]
1. ocean_+Bb[view] [source] 2024-09-15 21:03:18
>>babelf+(OP)
Lot of people critiquing this, but you can't deny the success. I think a lot of the advice is applicable to startups.

1. KPIs, for Beast they are CTR, AVD, AVP, will look different if you are a startup. I am willing to bet he knows his metrics better than >95% of startup founders. Because he is literally hacking/being judged by an algorithm, his KPIs will matter more and can be closely dissected. Startups aren't that easy in that sense, but KPIs still matter.

2. Hiring only A-players. Bloated teams kill startups.

3. Building value > making money

4. Rewarding employees who make value for the business and think like founders/equity owners, not employees.

5. Understanding that some videos only his team can do, and actively exploiting and widening that gap.

The management/communication stuff is mostly about working on set/dealing with physical scale. You need a lot more hands dealing with logistics, which requires hardline communication and management. In startups, the team is usually really lean and technical, so management becomes more straightforward.

I am also getting some bad culture vibes from the PDF and really dislike the writing style. I think it's important not to micromanage to the extent he is--it's necessary, maybe, for his business. Not for startups. Interesting perspective, reminds me of a chef de cuisine in a cutthroat 90s kitchen. The dishes (videos) have to be perfect, they require a lot of prep and a lot of hands, and you have to consistently pump them out.

◧◩
2. spence+Hx1[view] [source] 2024-09-16 12:53:29
>>ocean_+Bb
I read the entire document and I don't understand where you saw bad culture or micromanaging.

Some people may not like the fact that they pull all nighters, but that's a matter of opinion. Clearly some people do like the terms of employment, otherwise they wouldn't work there.

◧◩◪
3. smt88+TA1[view] [source] 2024-09-16 13:20:00
>>spence+Hx1
> Clearly some people do like the terms of employment, otherwise they wouldn't work there.

This is a deeply naive understanding of employment.

Almost no one has a huge array of job opportunities, and they can select the one they want based on company culture.

Most people have one viable job offer at a time, and they have to work hard for it. This is even more true in entertainment fields. Many people in entertainment feel lucky to be a paid employee at all, and they can't choose between a job that requires all-nighters and one that doesn't.

◧◩◪◨
4. javier+sK1[view] [source] 2024-09-16 14:21:00
>>smt88+TA1
This is not a foxcon factory, this is the most famous and productive Youtube production company. People here work incredibly hard IN ORDER TO get this particular job, seeking it out specifically.

> Many people in entertainment feel lucky to be a paid employee at all

And this is BY CHOICE.

I fundamentally disagree with your positioning.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. nother+pP2[view] [source] 2024-09-16 20:33:33
>>javier+sK1
Yeah people will do the job for free basically. I don’t think you could have the same culture if your business was cleaning port-a-pottys.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. smt88+n63[view] [source] 2024-09-16 22:08:08
>>nother+pP2
We know this isn't true because of the necessity of unions. Mining coal and many other trades are a lot worse than cleaning toilets, and people still had to do them nearly for free.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Wolfen+934[view] [source] 2024-09-17 07:26:36
>>smt88+n63
Unions are no longer necessary.

That's not a value judgement on my part, just a conclusion from decades of declining union membership, with no correlating uptick in starvation or massive reduction in wages.

(You may argue for wage stagnation, and you may attribute that to declining unionism, but that is not a collapse in wages!)

[go to top]