zlacker

[return to "Electricity prices in France turn negative as renewable energy floods the grid"]
1. Ecomme+1f[view] [source] 2024-06-18 19:13:50
>>Capsta+(OP)
What I never understood was how France gets 70-75% of their electricity from Nuclear, yet their energy prices aren't "too cheap to meter", and while cheaper than their neighbors, don't really raise any eyebrows. Wouldn't this be a major example of why Nuclear is NOT the future?
◧◩
2. hn_thr+9h[view] [source] 2024-06-18 19:27:54
>>Ecomme+1f
> Wouldn't this be a major example of why Nuclear is NOT the future?

Not at all. Nobody has really put forth "too cheap to meter" as a rationale for nuclear for 50 years or more.

The issue is that nuclear is currently the only reliable base load generation technology that doesn't produce carbon (except perhaps hydro for reasonable definitions of "reliable"). The other top technologies either produce carbon (natural gas and coal) or are unreliable (solar and wind).

I actually don't believe nuclear is "the future" because I think renewables + battery storage will be more economical going forward and less politically dicey. But France is currently the envy of the world for their energy generation save for some countries with unique environments that allow for a lot of carbon-free generation (e.g. Norway with hydro and Iceland with geothermal).

◧◩◪
3. Herz+Ii[view] [source] 2024-06-18 19:37:18
>>hn_thr+9h
Isn't it a bit whishful thinking to think that storage will come down in price and nuclear won't?

Beyond that, leaving out storage costs, what are the technologies that can cover the world's storage? And in what quantities?

Because if I think of lithium, wouldn't it be an environmental disaster to extract and recycle all the materials involved?

In general, I don't understand why basically nuclear is to be replaced.

◧◩◪◨
4. Damogr+3o[view] [source] 2024-06-18 20:04:28
>>Herz+Ii
There are other storage technologies being fielded...they haven't been popular because their energy densities are low...but if you have a 2000 lb hunk of Iron Aire battery next to your house, who cares? (https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a42532492/ir...)
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Herz+1q[view] [source] 2024-06-18 20:18:03
>>Damogr+3o
Do you have any idea how long it takes for a technology at a research stage to enter scale production and be commercially viable?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Damogr+Ss[view] [source] 2024-06-18 20:36:53
>>Herz+1q
I don't have my eye on these technologies (there were at least two that I've run across that were REALLY HEAVY), so I can't tell you how close they are to production. But every bit helps and the amazing pouch batteries in your laptop weren't developed overnight... 18650 batteries are astounding compared to the Eveready Alkalines of my youth, and available for $3 a piece in quantity.
[go to top]