zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. rat998+94[view] [source] 2022-10-02 14:50:36
>>rvz+(OP)
I am the only one who would have a hard time to collaborate on a project where the "collaborators" start their message with

> You need to realize that

> (a) reality trumps fantasy

?

◧◩
2. zo1+g8[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:13:21
>>rat998+94
Then it's probably not the place for you, or people with thin skin that don't want to deal with that kind of tone/communication. If they lose out on talent because of it, that's their loss. Not every project has to be perfect and all-inclusive to the entire world of developers, and I'm okay with that.
◧◩◪
3. myname+Y8[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:18:02
>>zo1+g8
It’s crazy to think that advocating for reasonable, non-toxic people to work with receives this kind response.

Inclusivity and non-hostile work environments should not be considered “perfect” and “all-inclusive”. They should be basic. The default. The lowest bar possible.

◧◩◪◨
4. mid-ki+E9[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:22:23
>>myname+Y8
Just as many people have problems with this form of communication, many people find it hard to clearly express themselves in an environment where they're expected to put people's feelings above all else. What some might perceive as "hostile", others would simply call "honest". It's simply a matter of preference.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. nickm1+xo5[view] [source] 2022-10-04 04:58:42
>>mid-ki+E9
The choice between condescension to your collaborators and putting people's feeling "above all else" is a false dichotomy. You can disagree on technical merits without making it personal and calling your collaborators kindergarteners who believe in Santa Claus.
[go to top]