zlacker

[return to "It may just be a game to you, but it means the world to us"]
1. bingid+g4[view] [source] 2021-07-09 18:46:13
>>Tomte+(OP)
The green cross is generally the recommended alternative.

Note that this isn't normal copyright, the red cross is protected under the Geneva Conventions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emblems_of_the_International_R...

◧◩
2. mushuf+e5[view] [source] 2021-07-09 18:50:00
>>bingid+g4
If video games or art or movies are depicting the appropriate scenarios, such as a scene involving army medics, wouldn't that be a constructive use of the symbol? It would spread awareness and education.

A green cross would confuse people.

◧◩◪
3. tyingq+06[view] [source] 2021-07-09 18:53:40
>>mushuf+e5
That's where I'm confused. I see the issue with products appropriating it as a sort of brand hijacking...like the example of a first aid kit with a red cross.

But tv, movies, games, etc, just showing an accurate representation of real life, within the media itself seems...normal.

I think if they have to, the least confusing thing would be a red square with a white cross inside it. That's what a lot of first aid kits seem to do. Though perhaps the Swiss wouldn't be thrilled. Maybe a white cross in a red circle?

◧◩◪◨
4. crooke+Gc[view] [source] 2021-07-09 19:28:02
>>tyingq+06
> an accurate representation of real life

In real life, the symbol is pretty strictly limited to a specific international organization well-known for their neutrality in armed conflict. Portraying it as just meaning 'healing' takes away from the power of that neutrality.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tyingq+Eg[view] [source] 2021-07-09 19:52:37
>>crooke+Gc
>the symbol is pretty strictly limited to a specific international

It's not though. Lots of military ambulances, from many countries, not associated with the Red Cross, have a red cross on them.

One example, there are many more: https://www.google.com/search?q=british+military+ambulance&t...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. bingid+ti[view] [source] 2021-07-09 20:04:39
>>tyingq+Eg
These are medical units that fall under the protections of the red cross as outlined in the Geneva Conventions.

"Under the Geneva Conventions, the three distinctive emblems of the red cross, red crescent and red crystal are intended to identify and protect medical and relief workers, military and civilian medical facilities, mobile units and hospital ships during armed conflict."

https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/Inte... (PDF)

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. tyingq+Mi[view] [source] 2021-07-09 20:06:55
>>bingid+ti
Ah, but going back up to the top, the Red Cross seems to be unhappy with in-game depictions of this reality.

Edit: Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought the Red Cross was complaining about military ambulances, hospital ships, and so on, depicted in games. In addition to less realistic uses.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. bingid+Zk[view] [source] 2021-07-09 20:22:20
>>tyingq+Mi
Because it's used generally as "health" and not "protected health worker" in video games.

I suspect the red cross would not take issue with a game using the red cross to depict untargatable aid workers.

[go to top]