zlacker

[return to "Americans Want to Believe Jobs Are the Solution to Poverty. They’re Not"]
1. brickc+73[view] [source] 2018-09-11 19:40:53
>>tysone+(OP)
Poverty in America is a result of American capitalism, at a very high level. At a very very high level, it is caused by human greed, and a lack of love for our neighbors.

We can talk about wages and employment rates, and race all day long, but those are just details. It's human greed in the end, and our inability to love others like we love ourselves.

◧◩
2. oh_sig+kG[view] [source] 2018-09-12 02:12:07
>>brickc+73
What is poverty in noncapitalist countries a result of?
◧◩◪
3. brickc+uQ[view] [source] 2018-09-12 05:13:18
>>oh_sig+kG
Human greed lol or they're poor and nobody wants to help them because they're too busy covering their own asses. Basically there's enough resources in the world for nobody to live in poverty. It doesn't work because nobody's willing to make it work, which is just human nature of selfishness.
◧◩◪◨
4. brickc+wQ[view] [source] 2018-09-12 05:13:42
>>brickc+uQ
And I don't deny this nature in myself
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. apatte+iR[view] [source] 2018-09-12 05:28:19
>>brickc+wQ
It seems like you're lamenting what is basically an immutable biological trait without proposing any solutions. I don't think this adds much to the discussion.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. toofy+Q01[view] [source] 2018-09-12 07:54:44
>>apatte+iR
> ... without proposing any solutions...

While I don't necessarily agree with everything the poster is saying--implying that someone is only allowed to discuss topics in which they have a readily available solution would likely ruin most discussion on the internet and it would certainly put a damper on scientific work the world over.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. apatte+921[view] [source] 2018-09-12 08:13:39
>>toofy+Q01
I thought the pre-edit version of your comment was more interesting. Debate is a very different thing from scientific research. I think debates have better outcomes when you follow a few rules (civility, charity, a focus on possible solutions that benefit all parties). The rules for scientific R&D are different.

But whether the "enlightenment project" benefits from simply making complaints is a valid question. I still think the answer is no, or at least that if you're going to make a complaint, your position is improved by proposing a solution for discussion. I concede that it might be possible to make an effective and evidence-based counterargument, but are there meaningful social movements which have been based solely on complaining about stuff with no action platform?

[go to top]