zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. izacus+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-05-29 20:54:21
So alleged hearsay is now enough to raise the sentence to a life in prison in US? O.o
replies(1): >>Boards+15
2. Boards+15[view] [source] 2015-05-29 21:42:17
>>izacus+(OP)
It's just amazing to me how just alleging something by press release then withdrawing the allegation from the trial is enough to sentence somebody in the mind of the public. Just look at how people here are voting.
replies(1): >>mpyne+Da
◧◩
3. mpyne+Da[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-05-29 22:52:58
>>Boards+15
It's amazing to me how people can be pointed to literally where in a charging document you can find where the government actually included murder-for-hire as part of the charges against Ulbricht and yet "people here" can still manage to avoid seeing it...
replies(1): >>diyorg+jr
◧◩◪
4. diyorg+jr[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-05-30 04:53:33
>>mpyne+Da
Except presumption of innocence is supposed to be a cornerstone of the american justice system. Until that he hired a killer is proven in a criminal court, we all ought to refrain from making the assumption that such accusations in any way reflect the truth of the matter.
replies(1): >>mpyne+gG
◧◩◪◨
5. mpyne+gG[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-05-30 12:39:58
>>diyorg+jr
His complicity in murder-for-hire was part of Count One of the indictment. The jury convicted him on all Counts.

Ergo, his involvement in murder-for-hire has been proven in a criminal court, and I will feel free to repeat that fact ad nauseum.

[go to top]