zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mpyne+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-05-29 22:52:58
It's amazing to me how people can be pointed to literally where in a charging document you can find where the government actually included murder-for-hire as part of the charges against Ulbricht and yet "people here" can still manage to avoid seeing it...
replies(1): >>diyorg+Gg
2. diyorg+Gg[view] [source] 2015-05-30 04:53:33
>>mpyne+(OP)
Except presumption of innocence is supposed to be a cornerstone of the american justice system. Until that he hired a killer is proven in a criminal court, we all ought to refrain from making the assumption that such accusations in any way reflect the truth of the matter.
replies(1): >>mpyne+Dv
◧◩
3. mpyne+Dv[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-05-30 12:39:58
>>diyorg+Gg
His complicity in murder-for-hire was part of Count One of the indictment. The jury convicted him on all Counts.

Ergo, his involvement in murder-for-hire has been proven in a criminal court, and I will feel free to repeat that fact ad nauseum.

[go to top]