zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. sp332+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 18:57:12
The opposite, actually. This is about giving the spoils to everyone who didn't invent the transistor.
replies(1): >>gohrt+L2
2. gohrt+L2[view] [source] 2014-06-12 19:28:03
>>sp332+(OP)
the spoils to everyone who innovated on the transistor.
replies(2): >>sp332+e6 >>gdilla+sb
◧◩
3. sp332+e6[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 20:16:00
>>gohrt+L2
Not necessarily, unless they also got patents on their innovations.
replies(1): >>Anthon+af
◧◩
4. gdilla+sb[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 21:19:12
>>gohrt+L2
That's what I meant. THose that generated the most value on the transistor, got the spoils - eg Fairchild, Intel, etc
◧◩◪
5. Anthon+af[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 22:00:50
>>sp332+e6
You're aware that it's possible to make money on an invention without patenting it. First to market advantage, a foothold in the market, continuing brand recognition as the go-to source for that product, a head start on the next round of innovation, increased sales across the industry as the product becomes more valuable to customers, increased sales of complementary products and services, etc.
replies(1): >>jedrek+JC
◧◩◪◨
6. jedrek+JC[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-13 07:06:35
>>Anthon+af
Or just keeping it a trade secret, like WD-40.
[go to top]