zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. gdilla+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 18:41:01
Didn't know that! That turned out well. To the innovators go the spoils.
replies(1): >>sp332+y1
2. sp332+y1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 18:57:12
>>gdilla+(OP)
The opposite, actually. This is about giving the spoils to everyone who didn't invent the transistor.
replies(1): >>gohrt+j4
◧◩
3. gohrt+j4[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 19:28:03
>>sp332+y1
the spoils to everyone who innovated on the transistor.
replies(2): >>sp332+M7 >>gdilla+0d
◧◩◪
4. sp332+M7[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 20:16:00
>>gohrt+j4
Not necessarily, unless they also got patents on their innovations.
replies(1): >>Anthon+Ig
◧◩◪
5. gdilla+0d[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 21:19:12
>>gohrt+j4
That's what I meant. THose that generated the most value on the transistor, got the spoils - eg Fairchild, Intel, etc
◧◩◪◨
6. Anthon+Ig[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 22:00:50
>>sp332+M7
You're aware that it's possible to make money on an invention without patenting it. First to market advantage, a foothold in the market, continuing brand recognition as the go-to source for that product, a head start on the next round of innovation, increased sales across the industry as the product becomes more valuable to customers, increased sales of complementary products and services, etc.
replies(1): >>jedrek+hE
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. jedrek+hE[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-13 07:06:35
>>Anthon+Ig
Or just keeping it a trade secret, like WD-40.
[go to top]