zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. coland+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:21:35
FFS, change the title back to what it was submitted with! "All Our Patent Are Belong To You" makes no sense out of context. At least the original title said something about Tesla Motors.
replies(3): >>fuddle+F >>chc+G1 >>wavefu+S1
2. fuddle+F[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:26:59
>>coland+(OP)
Mr Musk, I expected better grammar from you.
replies(2): >>petera+x1 >>tehweb+H8
◧◩
3. petera+x1[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:33:57
>>fuddle+F
It's a meme: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base
replies(2): >>fuddle+K2 >>larrys+g3
4. chc+G1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:34:43
>>coland+(OP)
This has been discussed a lot over the past few years. The title-changing policy is very widely disliked and leads to a lot of clearly poor results like this, but the mods are completely uninterested in changing it, so there it is. I don't know why we're even allowed to write titles anymore — it may just as well be populated by an automatic HTTP request.
replies(1): >>coland+E2
5. wavefu+S1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:36:15
>>coland+(OP)
That's not how HN works, however you feel about it.
◧◩
6. coland+E2[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:41:33
>>chc+G1
Yes I know, I've been here for many years. It just feels good to vent sometimes (at the cost of some karma).
◧◩◪
7. fuddle+K2[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:42:17
>>petera+x1
Right, I'll get my coat..
◧◩◪
8. larrys+g3[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:45:45
>>petera+x1
Thanks for pointing that out (I didn't know that). That said I think it's a bit immature and out of place in a public blog post (which will no doubt be repeated elsewhere) for such a visible company that wishes to be taken seriously.
replies(1): >>chc+24
◧◩◪◨
9. chc+24[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:55:11
>>larrys+g3
Not everyone subscribes to the theory that companies must have a grim and humorless face. I don't see why a lighthearted title is a bad thing. It's not like it's lowbrow or mean-spirited humor.
replies(1): >>larrys+F9
◧◩
10. tehweb+H8[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 18:44:34
>>fuddle+F
Upvoted because it's OK for you to not know every meme from the 1990s

Today you are one of the 10,000 - http://xkcd.com/1053/

◧◩◪◨⬒
11. larrys+F9[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 18:55:42
>>chc+24
Why? Because it's not just being lighthearted. It appears to be bad use of english.
replies(1): >>TeMPOr+Nh
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
12. TeMPOr+Nh[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 20:35:59
>>larrys+F9
Bad use of english is purposeful - it's a meme, one of the oldest and most widely recognized on the Internet. He's just showing some humour (not the first time).

http://xkcd.com/286/ seems relevant here ;).

replies(1): >>larrys+8b1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
13. larrys+8b1[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-13 15:17:01
>>TeMPOr+Nh
So you are saying that the audience for the blog post consists of an overwhelming number of people that understand that meme? As opposed to people who do not? I disagree.
[go to top]