zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. larrys+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:45:45
Thanks for pointing that out (I didn't know that). That said I think it's a bit immature and out of place in a public blog post (which will no doubt be repeated elsewhere) for such a visible company that wishes to be taken seriously.
replies(1): >>chc+M
2. chc+M[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:55:11
>>larrys+(OP)
Not everyone subscribes to the theory that companies must have a grim and humorless face. I don't see why a lighthearted title is a bad thing. It's not like it's lowbrow or mean-spirited humor.
replies(1): >>larrys+p6
◧◩
3. larrys+p6[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 18:55:42
>>chc+M
Why? Because it's not just being lighthearted. It appears to be bad use of english.
replies(1): >>TeMPOr+xe
◧◩◪
4. TeMPOr+xe[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 20:35:59
>>larrys+p6
Bad use of english is purposeful - it's a meme, one of the oldest and most widely recognized on the Internet. He's just showing some humour (not the first time).

http://xkcd.com/286/ seems relevant here ;).

replies(1): >>larrys+S71
◧◩◪◨
5. larrys+S71[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-13 15:17:01
>>TeMPOr+xe
So you are saying that the audience for the blog post consists of an overwhelming number of people that understand that meme? As opposed to people who do not? I disagree.
[go to top]