zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. gkober+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:09:28
They have to keep the patents (or donate them to a trusted third part, as a bunch of tech companies have done). They unfortunately need the protection. Otherwise, someone could sue them.

I think Musk's word in this case is good. He's not a nobody; his reputation is stellar.

replies(3): >>IBM+7 >>tnorth+81 >>lclark+k1
2. IBM+7[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:10:23
>>gkober+(OP)
They should license the patents for free to anyone who wants to use them. There's no word needed.
replies(1): >>gtirlo+q3
3. tnorth+81[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:18:26
>>gkober+(OP)
A general business tip: rely on someone's reputation as a signal that you should consider doing business with them, and then rely on their signature on a contract to protect you when you do business with them.
4. lclark+k1[view] [source] 2014-06-12 17:20:16
>>gkober+(OP)
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Patent_non-aggression_pacts is an option that is a tad more legally binding.
◧◩
5. gtirlo+q3[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 17:36:39
>>IBM+7
Looks who's talking, the largest patent holder and bureaucratic entity on Earth. Yeah, right ;)
replies(1): >>ethbro+4g
◧◩◪
6. ethbro+4g[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-06-12 19:53:14
>>gtirlo+q3
I believe that was the joke. :)
[go to top]