zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. theori+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-01-25 19:30:33
This may be a joke, but a lot of people actually do get upset by this!
replies(1): >>ItendT+x1
2. ItendT+x1[view] [source] 2014-01-25 19:53:02
>>theori+(OP)
Just imagine how upset people would get if you referred to a mixed gender crowd as "ladies"

"come on now ladies lets move the tour along" "Who you calling 'lady'!?"

Guys really is just a historically ingrained shorthand. I don't think I've ever heard it used in this sort of context to cause harm. Using "Ladies" in this way, on the other hand, could cause yourself harm.

replies(2): >>theori+B3 >>roel_v+Z4
◧◩
3. theori+B3[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:17:39
>>ItendT+x1
Back in school, my sports coaches would sometimes refer to all male groups as "ladies". However, I suspect this is not what you're talking about ;)

As much as anything, I've heard many women refer to mixed gender groups as "guys" or "dudes". A lot of this "definition creep" is actually due to women themselves. Probably this is because the male identity is viewed as a source of power, and women seek this out and aim to identify with it.

In other words, I don't think the use of "guys" generically is being driven by sexist men. I think it's being driven by blurring of gender roles and definitions, and adoption of these generic terms by women.

◧◩
4. roel_v+Z4[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:36:20
>>ItendT+x1
Wtf are you talking about? People do that all the time.
[go to top]