zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. coucha+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:38:29
Tone argument[0] much?

[0]: http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Tone_argument

replies(4): >>mkdir+b2 >>vezzy-+w2 >>quenli+sq >>wutbro+1F
◧
2. mkdir+b2[view] [source] 2014-01-25 19:08:29
>>coucha+(OP)
He was simply pointing out that the grandparent's communication style is a bit misleading. Nothing wrong with that.
◧
3. vezzy-+w2[view] [source] 2014-01-25 19:13:18
>>coucha+(OP)
Please do not link to the Geek Feminism Wiki. It is nothing but an incoherent and poorly organized collection of anecdotes.
replies(1): >>rmrfrm+Z6
◧◩
4. rmrfrm+Z6[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:14:13
>>vezzy-+w2
Ad hominem?
replies(1): >>forgot+08
◧◩◪
5. forgot+08[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:26:50
>>rmrfrm+Z6
Nope. Ad hominem would be attacking that website's content and/or credibility by insulting the people that write it. The parent poster is critical of the wiki contents itself.
◧
6. quenli+sq[view] [source] 2014-01-26 01:26:35
>>coucha+(OP)
Fallacy fallacy much?
◧
7. wutbro+1F[view] [source] 2014-01-26 07:48:08
>>coucha+(OP)
Ugh, why is the simple-minded application of buzzwords so horribly prevalent in discussions of this nature. I honestly can't think of anything that exemplifies "derailing" more than posting links to Geek Feminism that are almost entirely irrelevant as part of a complaint about someone's comment.
[go to top]