zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. boyaka+(OP)[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:35:26
Adding additional information can be done in parentheses or additional paragraphs, not by pretending to be sources.
replies(2): >>coucha+d >>blahed+g
2. coucha+d[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:38:29
>>boyaka+(OP)
Tone argument[0] much?

[0]: http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Tone_argument

replies(4): >>mkdir+o2 >>vezzy-+J2 >>quenli+Fq >>wutbro+eF
3. blahed+g[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:39:00
>>boyaka+(OP)
They're footnotes. Footnotes are used both to cite sources and to make remarks that are relevant but would break up the flow of the prose.
◧◩
4. mkdir+o2[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 19:08:29
>>coucha+d
He was simply pointing out that the grandparent's communication style is a bit misleading. Nothing wrong with that.
◧◩
5. vezzy-+J2[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 19:13:18
>>coucha+d
Please do not link to the Geek Feminism Wiki. It is nothing but an incoherent and poorly organized collection of anecdotes.
replies(1): >>rmrfrm+c7
◧◩◪
6. rmrfrm+c7[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:14:13
>>vezzy-+J2
Ad hominem?
replies(1): >>forgot+d8
◧◩◪◨
7. forgot+d8[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-25 20:26:50
>>rmrfrm+c7
Nope. Ad hominem would be attacking that website's content and/or credibility by insulting the people that write it. The parent poster is critical of the wiki contents itself.
◧◩
8. quenli+Fq[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-26 01:26:35
>>coucha+d
Fallacy fallacy much?
◧◩
9. wutbro+eF[view] [source] [discussion] 2014-01-26 07:48:08
>>coucha+d
Ugh, why is the simple-minded application of buzzwords so horribly prevalent in discussions of this nature. I honestly can't think of anything that exemplifies "derailing" more than posting links to Geek Feminism that are almost entirely irrelevant as part of a complaint about someone's comment.
[go to top]