zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. pitchu+(OP)[view] [source] 2013-02-16 06:05:23
Does a single server support this level of traffic? That is pretty impressive - it would be great to learn about the server's hardware and software configuration.
replies(3): >>pasbes+q4 >>jbvers+67 >>rtm+4K
2. pasbes+q4[view] [source] 2013-02-16 08:16:38
>>pitchu+(OP)
I don't know whether things have changed since, but some time ago (a year or more?), IIRC pg mentioned that the site was running on a single core. (I don't recall his saying what type of core.)

P.S. I see that abstractbill beat me to it, both in stating here and in originally acquiring this information:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5229548

3. jbvers+67[view] [source] 2013-02-16 09:43:33
>>pitchu+(OP)
Around 40-60 requests per second, of which almost anything an be cached. Any single server should suffice.
replies(1): >>markok+q9
◧◩
4. markok+q9[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-16 11:18:48
>>jbvers+67
But you would need at least 30 Heroku dynos to handle that reliably ;)
5. rtm+4K[view] [source] 2013-02-16 23:11:51
>>pitchu+(OP)
Old server: two Xeon E5450 chips, 3.0 GHz, 8 cores total, 24 GB RAM.

New server: one Xeon E5-2690 chip, 2.9 GHz, 8 cores total, 32 GB RAM.

replies(1): >>rdl+ks2
◧◩
6. rdl+ks2[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-18 19:16:48
>>rtm+4K
Wow, nice, that was exactly the HW I was predicting; the fastest single-core-performance xeon under turboboost.
[go to top]