zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. pg+(OP)[view] [source] 2013-02-16 03:14:43
We currently get just over 200k uniques and just under 2m page views on weekdays (less on weekends).
replies(2): >>dougla+W2 >>pitchu+g6
2. dougla+W2[view] [source] 2013-02-16 04:28:40
>>pg+(OP)
Thank you for creating a wonderful source of information!
3. pitchu+g6[view] [source] 2013-02-16 06:05:23
>>pg+(OP)
Does a single server support this level of traffic? That is pretty impressive - it would be great to learn about the server's hardware and software configuration.
replies(3): >>pasbes+Ga >>jbvers+md >>rtm+kQ
◧◩
4. pasbes+Ga[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-16 08:16:38
>>pitchu+g6
I don't know whether things have changed since, but some time ago (a year or more?), IIRC pg mentioned that the site was running on a single core. (I don't recall his saying what type of core.)

P.S. I see that abstractbill beat me to it, both in stating here and in originally acquiring this information:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5229548

◧◩
5. jbvers+md[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-16 09:43:33
>>pitchu+g6
Around 40-60 requests per second, of which almost anything an be cached. Any single server should suffice.
replies(1): >>markok+Gf
◧◩◪
6. markok+Gf[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-16 11:18:48
>>jbvers+md
But you would need at least 30 Heroku dynos to handle that reliably ;)
◧◩
7. rtm+kQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-16 23:11:51
>>pitchu+g6
Old server: two Xeon E5450 chips, 3.0 GHz, 8 cores total, 24 GB RAM.

New server: one Xeon E5-2690 chip, 2.9 GHz, 8 cores total, 32 GB RAM.

replies(1): >>rdl+Ay2
◧◩◪
8. rdl+Ay2[view] [source] [discussion] 2013-02-18 19:16:48
>>rtm+kQ
Wow, nice, that was exactly the HW I was predicting; the fastest single-core-performance xeon under turboboost.
[go to top]