zlacker

[parent] [thread] 14 comments
1. k8sToG+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-08 20:47:42
If you want me to read your comment, please pay me $1 first... if I find your comment interesting I might refund.
replies(2): >>herman+E >>jt2190+K
2. herman+E[view] [source] 2026-02-08 20:51:59
>>k8sToG+(OP)
I had this idea / pet project once where I did exactly this for email. Emails would immediately bounce with payment link and explanation. If you paid you get credit on a ledger per email address. Only then the mail goes through.

You can also integrate it in clients by adding payment/reward claim headers.

replies(2): >>Fnoord+sc >>zx8080+zo
3. jt2190+K[view] [source] 2026-02-08 20:52:23
>>k8sToG+(OP)
The market currently values your reading of HN comments at $0.
replies(1): >>AlexCo+bw
◧◩
4. Fnoord+sc[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 22:16:07
>>herman+E
Bill Gates already had this idea. All efforts to change email were already documented 25 years ago. The biggest changes are it is more centralized these days, SPF/DKIM/DMARC, JMAP innovation, oh... and one more thing! It is HUGE!! HTML email is the default...
replies(1): >>TurdF3+6l
◧◩◪
5. TurdF3+6l[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 23:23:32
>>Fnoord+sc
Yeah I remember this from "The Road Ahead" which I chanced upon one time in the 90s. I thought it was a silly idea.
◧◩
6. zx8080+zo[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 23:56:33
>>herman+E
Scammers (and spammers) always got $1! That's why there's a lot of the scam ads on google, fb, apple.

So the paywall email firewall will not work as desired.

replies(1): >>Dylan1+Zr
◧◩◪
7. Dylan1+Zr[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 00:26:45
>>zx8080+zo
Not many email attacks are worth an entire dollar. It would be very very effective at reducing spam. And too effective at reducing everything else.
replies(1): >>zx8080+vO
◧◩
8. AlexCo+bw[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 01:00:50
>>jt2190+K
I'm sure astroturfers value it more highly than that.
replies(1): >>vasco+171
◧◩◪◨
9. zx8080+vO[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 04:09:59
>>Dylan1+Zr
Emails to CEOs they do worth.
replies(1): >>Dylan1+8P
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. Dylan1+8P[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 04:14:33
>>zx8080+vO
So only CEOs will get spam, and it's effective for 99.9% of people? I would not describe that as "will not work as desired".
replies(1): >>Anthon+tT
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
11. Anthon+tT[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 05:10:21
>>Dylan1+8P
And it would even still work for the CEO, they would just have to charge more than $1.

The real problem is we don't have a low-friction digital payment system that allows individuals to automate sending payment requests for small amounts of money to each other without requiring everyone to sign up for a merchant account with a financial bureaucracy.

replies(1): >>SJC_Ha+i21
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
12. SJC_Ha+i21[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 06:54:09
>>Anthon+tT
> The real problem is we don't have a low-friction digital payment system that allows individuals to automate sending payment requests for small amounts of money to each other without requiring everyone to sign up for a merchant account with a financial bureaucracy.

Its called cryptocurrency

replies(1): >>Anthon+k31
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
13. Anthon+k31[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 07:03:30
>>SJC_Ha+i21
First you have to make it low-friction. If I want Joe Average to send me $1 in cryptocurrency, how is he getting $1 in cryptocurrency to send me?
◧◩◪
14. vasco+171[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 07:41:52
>>AlexCo+bw
The only way for you to be sure of that is if you're one.
replies(1): >>johnny+Wb1
◧◩◪◨
15. johnny+Wb1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 08:23:58
>>vasco+171
I'm sure there's literature out there on how much astroturfers are paid.
[go to top]