zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Dylan1+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-09 00:26:45
Not many email attacks are worth an entire dollar. It would be very very effective at reducing spam. And too effective at reducing everything else.
replies(1): >>zx8080+wm
2. zx8080+wm[view] [source] 2026-02-09 04:09:59
>>Dylan1+(OP)
Emails to CEOs they do worth.
replies(1): >>Dylan1+9n
◧◩
3. Dylan1+9n[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 04:14:33
>>zx8080+wm
So only CEOs will get spam, and it's effective for 99.9% of people? I would not describe that as "will not work as desired".
replies(1): >>Anthon+ur
◧◩◪
4. Anthon+ur[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 05:10:21
>>Dylan1+9n
And it would even still work for the CEO, they would just have to charge more than $1.

The real problem is we don't have a low-friction digital payment system that allows individuals to automate sending payment requests for small amounts of money to each other without requiring everyone to sign up for a merchant account with a financial bureaucracy.

replies(1): >>SJC_Ha+jA
◧◩◪◨
5. SJC_Ha+jA[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 06:54:09
>>Anthon+ur
> The real problem is we don't have a low-friction digital payment system that allows individuals to automate sending payment requests for small amounts of money to each other without requiring everyone to sign up for a merchant account with a financial bureaucracy.

Its called cryptocurrency

replies(1): >>Anthon+lB
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. Anthon+lB[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 07:03:30
>>SJC_Ha+jA
First you have to make it low-friction. If I want Joe Average to send me $1 in cryptocurrency, how is he getting $1 in cryptocurrency to send me?
[go to top]