zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. DJBunn+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-08 17:45:35
Indeed, it's relatively impossible without ties to real world identity.
replies(1): >>mjr00+Y1
2. mjr00+Y1[view] [source] 2026-02-08 17:58:07
>>DJBunn+(OP)
> Indeed, it's relatively impossible without ties to real world identity.

I don't think that's true? The goal of vouch isn't to say "@linus_torvalds is Linus Torvalds" it's to say "@linus_torvalds is a legitimate contributor an not an AI slopper/spammer". It's not vouching for their real world identity, or that they're a good person, or that they'll never add malware to their repositories. It's just vouching for the most basic level of "when this person puts out a PR it's not AI slop".

replies(1): >>DJBunn+rh
◧◩
3. DJBunn+rh[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 19:39:31
>>mjr00+Y1
That’s not the point.

Point is: when @lt100, @lt101, … , @lt999 all vouch for something, it’s worthless.

replies(2): >>jen20+ao >>Dylan1+9c1
◧◩◪
4. jen20+ao[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 20:22:59
>>DJBunn+rh
But surely then a maintainer notices what has happened, and resolves the problem?
◧◩◪
5. Dylan1+9c1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-09 03:28:42
>>DJBunn+rh
Real world identity isn't sufficient or necessary to solve that problem.
[go to top]