zlacker

[return to "Vouch"]
1. abraco+nt1[view] [source] 2026-02-08 17:42:48
>>chwtut+(OP)
Isn't it extremely difficult problem? It's very easy to game, vouch 1 entity that will invite lots of bad actors
◧◩
2. DJBunn+Ot1[view] [source] 2026-02-08 17:45:35
>>abraco+nt1
Indeed, it's relatively impossible without ties to real world identity.
◧◩◪
3. mjr00+Mv1[view] [source] 2026-02-08 17:58:07
>>DJBunn+Ot1
> Indeed, it's relatively impossible without ties to real world identity.

I don't think that's true? The goal of vouch isn't to say "@linus_torvalds is Linus Torvalds" it's to say "@linus_torvalds is a legitimate contributor an not an AI slopper/spammer". It's not vouching for their real world identity, or that they're a good person, or that they'll never add malware to their repositories. It's just vouching for the most basic level of "when this person puts out a PR it's not AI slop".

◧◩◪◨
4. DJBunn+fL1[view] [source] 2026-02-08 19:39:31
>>mjr00+Mv1
That’s not the point.

Point is: when @lt100, @lt101, … , @lt999 all vouch for something, it’s worthless.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Dylan1+XF2[view] [source] 2026-02-09 03:28:42
>>DJBunn+fL1
Real world identity isn't sufficient or necessary to solve that problem.
[go to top]