zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. nudpie+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-07 09:47:31
It was better because it had no silent errors, like 1+”1”. Far from perfect, the fact it raised exceptions and enforced the philosophy of “don’t ask for permission but forgiveness” makes the difference.

IMHO It’s irrelevant it has a slightly better typesystem and runtime but that’s totally irrelevant nowadays.

With AI doing mostly everything we should forget these past riddles. Now we all should be looking towards fail-safe systems, formal verification and domain modeling.

replies(2): >>whilen+D5 >>gianca+T91
2. whilen+D5[view] [source] 2026-02-07 11:17:30
>>nudpie+(OP)
Conflating types in binary operations hasn't been an issue for me since I started using TS in 2016. Even before that, it was just the result of domain modeling done badly, and I think software engineers got burned enough for using dynamic type systems at scale... but that's a discussion to be had 10 years ago. We all moved on from that, or at least I hope we did.

> Now we all should be looking towards fail-safe systems, formal verification and domain modeling.

We were looking forward to these things since the term distributed computing has been coined, haven't we? Building fail-safe systems has always been the goal since long-running processes were a thing.

Despite any "past riddles", the more expressive the type system the better the domain modeling experience, and I'd guess formal methods would benefit immensely from a good type system. Is there any formal language that is usable as general-purpose programming language I don't know of? I only ever see formal methods used for the verification of distributed algorithms or permission logic, on the theorem proving side of things, but I have yet to see a single application written only in something like Lean[0] or LiquidHaskell[1]...

[0]: https://lean-lang.org/

[1]: https://ucsd-progsys.github.io/liquidhaskell/

3. gianca+T91[view] [source] 2026-02-07 19:48:27
>>nudpie+(OP)
> With AI doing mostly everything we should forget these past riddles.

How I finally was able to make a large Rust project without having to sacrifice my free time to really fully understand Rust. I have read through the Rust book several times but I never have time to fully “practice” Rust, I was able to say screw it and built my own Rust software using Claude Code.

replies(1): >>nudpie+w62
◧◩
4. nudpie+w62[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-08 02:21:06
>>gianca+T91
And also with Ada which would be even safer. And the same it is for me... we all got trained in skills are slowly going to fade away.
[go to top]