zlacker

Though distasteful, the video has Biden for instance as a non-human primate as well[]. It's not just black people made to be into monkey or ape-like animals, and by no means were all black people portrayed as non-human primates (one was a hippo, for instance). I didn't even know it could be considered racist until the media told me it was supposed to be.

[] https://x.com/xerias_x/status/1981716010483753013

>>mothba+(OP)
Wow, is there anything you wouldn’t work so hard to justify? Can you reference anything you perceive as racist?

>>voganm+v3
Sure, for instance, SCOTUS justice RBG once wrote a minority opinion in Rice v Cayetano that it is OK to ban certain races from voting in certain public elections. Obviously, RBG was a flaming racist and thankfully her opinion was overruled.

So yes I would say people like Ruth Ginsburg who didn't believe in the 15th amendment allowing equal voting rights with regards to race, are racists.

>>mothba+k6
Look at all those details omitted!

This was an indigenous people treaty case, and when mothballed says "certain public elections" they mean "a single election for a position in Hawaii which was established in negotiations with indigenous Hawaiians in the 1970s. Not, however, a treaty obligation.

I don't know that I agree with RGB here, but I don't find that to be a racist opinion.

>>Bryant+V8
I love it. A video depicting both white and black people as non-human primates is more racist than literally using the might of the state to try and block excluded races from voting for a public office.

This is part of the reason why the nominally anti-racist zealots are losing the battle. We want to live in a world where it's actually considered racist to exclude races in a public election, rather than one where it's not racist to exclude races from a public election but somehow more racist to post a multi-racial video depicting whites and others as non-human animals.

>>mothba+z9
Would you say a 25 year old opinion by a single dead Supreme Court justice is more damaging to your supposed platform than voter ID laws, gerrymandering, and the attack on vote by mail?

>>cosmic+oj
No, it just is the most direct obvious example I can find of high level assistance in violating the 15th amendment since the year 2000. I have no doubt all of your examples have also been used to effectuate the same thing, they just have a little more plausible deniability to the point it's harder to point out in black and white.

I was not asked to contemplate every example of racism.

The ID bit is particularly amusing to look at. In my state you need an ID to vote but not to conceal carry a gun. In Illinois it's the exact opposite, with a lot of handwaving why you need an ID to prove you are a 'person' but not a 'citizen'. Obviously the states and government are totally inconsistent on the issue of ID to exercise rights.

Mail voting might be more prejudicial to the poor with irregular addresses, since their only option is to vote in person whereas those better off with regular mail access can vote via mail or in person.

Overall I would take a stab that both mail voting and ID requirements yield a net slight prejudice against some minorities. Gerrymandering is just dog-shit all around.

>>mothba+Pk
> I was not asked to contemplate every example of racism.

I mean quite clearly you were responding literally to a commenter's disbelief that you think the video didn't intentionally use racist imagery.

So you could have not chosen any example. Or one that is relevant to the current state of the world, even if it hides behind a mask of legitimacy.

Anyway, I imagine if RBG were here she'd probably have something to say on response but I can't think of anything that is more of a non-controversy.