zlacker

>>only_i+(OP)
Though distasteful, the video has Biden for instance as a non-human primate as well[]. It's not just black people made to be into monkey or ape-like animals, and by no means were all black people portrayed as non-human primates (one was a hippo, for instance). I didn't even know it could be considered racist until the media told me it was supposed to be.

[] https://x.com/xerias_x/status/1981716010483753013

>>mothba+5o
Wow, is there anything you wouldn’t work so hard to justify? Can you reference anything you perceive as racist?

>>voganm+Ar
Sure, for instance, SCOTUS justice RBG once wrote a minority opinion in Rice v Cayetano that it is OK to ban certain races from voting in certain public elections. Obviously, RBG was a flaming racist and thankfully her opinion was overruled.

So yes I would say people like Ruth Ginsburg who didn't believe in the 15th amendment allowing equal voting rights with regards to race, are racists.

>>mothba+pu
Look at all those details omitted!

This was an indigenous people treaty case, and when mothballed says "certain public elections" they mean "a single election for a position in Hawaii which was established in negotiations with indigenous Hawaiians in the 1970s. Not, however, a treaty obligation.

I don't know that I agree with RGB here, but I don't find that to be a racist opinion.

>>Bryant+0x
I love it. A video depicting both white and black people as non-human primates is more racist than literally using the might of the state to try and block excluded races from voting for a public office.

This is part of the reason why the nominally anti-racist zealots are losing the battle. We want to live in a world where it's actually considered racist to exclude races in a public election, rather than one where it's not racist to exclude races from a public election but somehow more racist to post a multi-racial video depicting whites and others as non-human animals.

>>mothba+Ex
Would you say a 25 year old opinion by a single dead Supreme Court justice is more damaging to your supposed platform than voter ID laws, gerrymandering, and the attack on vote by mail?