zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. shigaw+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-05 04:08:58
I think it is more externally driven as well, a prisoners dilemma.

I don't want to keep crapping out questionable features but if competitors keep doing it the customer wants it -- even if infrastructure and bug fixes would actually make their life better.

replies(1): >>bunder+B4
2. bunder+B4[view] [source] 2026-02-05 05:01:53
>>shigaw+(OP)
Last time I saw results of a survey on this, it found that for most consumers AI features are a deciding factor in their purchasing decisions. That is, if they are looking at two options and one sports AI features and the other doesn’t, they will pick the one that doesn’t.

It’s possible AI just seems more popular than it is because it’s easy to hear the people who are talking about it but harder to hear the people who aren’t.

replies(2): >>nosian+4x >>skepti+9C
◧◩
3. nosian+4x[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 09:25:11
>>bunder+B4
Consumers is nice, but far more important are the big corporate purchases. There may be a lot of people there too who don't want AI, but they all depend on decisions made at the top and AI seems to be the way to go, because of expectations and also because of the mentioned prisoner's dilemma, if competitors gain an advantage it is bad for your org, if all fail together it is manageable.
◧◩
4. skepti+9C[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 10:06:53
>>bunder+B4
That’s because so much experience with ai is completely crap and useless.
[go to top]