zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ddtayl+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:48:59
It depends on if parallel reconstruction can be used to provide deniability.
replies(1): >>chucka+h2
2. chucka+h2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:59:49
>>ddtayl+(OP)
Even a parallel construction has limited uses, since you can't use the same excuse every time. The NSA probably doesn't trust the FBI to come up with something plausible.
replies(1): >>ddtayl+Nb5
◧◩
3. ddtayl+Nb5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-06 00:03:07
>>chucka+h2
That depends on how apathetic people are. Most of the time they will accept a completely garbage story and you can create infinitely many of those.
replies(1): >>chucka+L27
◧◩◪
4. chucka+L27[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-06 15:55:06
>>ddtayl+Nb5
Sure, and that’s why juries buy the same line from cops every time, but major actors actually affected by potential backdoors are likely to be a bit more skeptical and start digging around for the real reasons.
[go to top]